Scott prevails over Jones et al


Today I want to talk about the defeat suffered by Bobbi Jones et al. when the court granted Plaintiff, Melissa Scott’s, motion to dismiss the counter-claim. This is a significant defeat for Jones and her co-defendants. In her counterclaim, Jones attempted to initiate a declaratory action against Melissa Scott. The counterclaim alleged 3 controversies: 1) The alleged infringement was actually fair use 2) Plaintiff’s conduct violates defendant, Jones’ et al, First Amendment right to free speech 3) Dr. Scott’s works cannot be copyrighted because his words constitute the “the word of God” (This is a simplistic explanation of the controversies within defendant’s counterclaim). I couldn’t help but notice, the naked license and limited abandonment theories were not argued at all, in Jones’ counterclaim. I was certain that it would be there. But I guess my theory that these cases are woven together with Doc’s Dream, LLC. was incorrect. Either that or the parties are putting on a show for the public in the google groups but secretly, they know that these are weak arguments. I believe they are weak defenses, but that’s just my opinion. I still don’t have all the evidence to say conclusively.



The court granted Plaintiff, Melissa Scott’s, motion to dismiss. The motion was granted due to defendant’s failure to state any legal controversy. All facts favored the Plaintiff. The only remark the judge made to plaintiff was regarding a technicality (Plaintiff could have filed the motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) instead but there is still standing under Rule 12(b)(6).



The court granted the motion on all points brought by plaintiff.



This defeat is riddled with innuendoes of a client forcing the lawyer to argue the case their way. I can’t believe the attorney argued these points. It could be a situation where the clients are very emotional and controlling. When emotions are involved in the legal system, you get epic defeats like this one. This is my theory, based on the emotions that rage in the google group in which I posted. Tensions were high and people were sensitive. No one likes to be told that they have a losing case, but the odds are not in favor of Bobbi Jones, et al. and the people who are Jones’ and Robinson cheerleaders let me know that they didn’t like what I was saying.



So now the cases proceed with Scott and Dolores Press as the sole Plaintiffs. Meanwhile there are two other cases filed by Scott, against Briggs and Todd, wherein the defendants failed to respond, and their defaults are being taken. The next step in these cases will be a judgment prove up, then the court will enter the judgments. Those cases are almost over and will end in a victory for Scott. As I recall, the people in the google group were adamant to tell me that Scott had lost every case, but that is not the case. It appears that she has prevailed in all matters so far. There is one matter between Dolores/Scott and Dream/Robinson that needs to be decided before the case can move forward: A motion to consolidate cases. Dream/Robinson believe that the appellate court granted them a partial reversal on their declaratory action defeat. I don’t read the appellate order this way, but we will see what Judge Real has to say about the matter. I will post again once Real makes his decision.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Patrick Robinson Going to Free Up Dr. Gene Scott's Copyrights?

Will an effective defense by Patrick Robinson in a copyright infringement case “free up the copyrights” of Dr. Gene Scott’s works? Read on to find out the answer. I’ve been watching this battle play out with concern, as should anyone with an interest in copyright law, whether they be a small-time production or even Walt Disney Company. The claims being made, and defenses raised in this complicated issue of copyright infringement and claims of copyright abandonment could have a wide range of effects on copyright law. But are any of them favorable to Patrick Robinson’s group? This case has gone up and down the proverbial field of play, from the initial copyright infringement cases being dismissed to the abandonment theory being defeated in cross-motions for summary judgment. You may be asking, what is a motion for summary judgment, let alone a cross-motion? It’s not that difficult to understand and I’ll walk you through it if you’ll read on. On one side of the playi...
Read more

Patrick Robinson Gives an Update in His FUMS #41

In his FUMS #41 video Patrick Robinson gives another victory update. But is this an accurate report? It is correct that the court did rule on the motion for consolidation. This was a motion brought by Dolores/Scott and opposed by Robinson. Therefore, I cannot comprehend Robinson’s update. In the video, Robinson says a few things that are inaccurate: 1) The cases are being consolidated under his first case. 2) Robinson acts like this consolidation is a victory for his group. 3) The undisputed fact that “It is undisputed that Dr. Gene Scott permitted downloads and encouraged the sharing and distribution of his teachings.” The first point is false. The cases are being assigned under Dolores Press’ first filed case, as evidenced by the court’s order Granting Dolores Press’ Motion for Consolidation, document 164 filed on 08/13/2019 page 4 of 4, wherein the Judge ordered the cases be consolidated under: Dolores Press Inc. v Patrick Robinson, et al. 2:15-cv-02562-R-PLA. Furthe...
Read more

Did Anthony Todd Testify Against Himself?

Is it possible to testify against yourself in a trial in which you did not appear? Anthony Todd may find out soon enough. On Friday, September 27, 2019 Melissa Scott’s attorneys filed a Motion for Reconsideration regarding the denied injunction against Todd. In Scott’s proposed judgment it was requested that Todd be enjoined from further infringement, and among other things, for Todd to preserve every file of Dr. Scott’s works. Judge Klausner denied the injunction reasoning that Scott had not proven that Todd was likely to continue to infringe. He further denied the preservation of all files because that was not what the complaint requested. In Friday’s moving papers, Scott’s attorneys request the Judge reconsider his previous orders and issue the injunction. The documents contain screenshots of Posts by Todd wherein he is conversing with other people online in google groups and Facebook. In these posts Todd promises Scott that he will not stop sharing the files...
Read more